In re R.G.
This text of 2008 Ohio 6694 (In re R.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re R.G., 120 Ohio St.3d 359, 2008-Ohio-6694.]
IN RE R.G. [Cite as In re R.G., 120 Ohio St.3d 359, 2008-Ohio-6694.] Discretionary appeal accepted and judgment of the court of appeals reversed on the authority of In re T.R. (No. 2008-1474 — Submitted November 18, 2008 — Decided December 24, 2008.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 22482, 2008-Ohio-2895. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re T.R., 120 Ohio St.3d 136, 2008-Ohio-5219, 896 N.E.2d 1003. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL, J., would accept the appeal but remand the cause for consideration of In re T.R. __________________ Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jill R. Sink, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant, Montgomery County Children Services. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 Ohio 6694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rg-ohio-2008.