In Re: Reynolds

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2010·No. 10-1147·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1147

In Re: WILLIE REYNOLDS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:90-cr-00054-NCT-1)

Submitted: September 15, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Reynolds, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Reynolds has petitioned this court for a writ

of mandamus. In his petition, Reynolds asks this court to order

the district court to rule on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)

motion for sentence reduction, as well as his motion to expedite

the proceedings before the district court. Reynolds has also

filed a motion to expedite the proceedings before this court.

Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the

district court denied Reynolds’ § 3582(c)(2) motion on September

10, 2010, thereby rendering the motion to expedite pending in

the district court moot. Accordingly, we deny Reynolds’

mandamus petition and motion to expedite before this court as

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Reynolds, (4th Cir. 2010).

In Re: Reynolds (In Re: Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related