In re Regina C.

235 A.D.2d 422, 652 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 144
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 422 (In re Regina C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Regina C., 235 A.D.2d 422, 652 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the parental rights of Regina C., the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Gage, J.), dated January 30, 1995, which, after a hearing, terminated the parental rights of the mother. The notice of appeal from a fact-finding order dated January 10, 1995, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order of disposition dated January 30, 1995 (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

[423]*423Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although a portion of the caseworker’s testimony was hearsay, it was material and relevant to the issue of whether the appellant mother violated the terms of an earlier order of the same court, dated July 14, 1993, and thus was properly admitted at the dispositional hearing (see, Family Ct Act § 624; Matter of David Michael J., 217 AD2d 1008).

Contrary to the appellant mother’s contention, it was unnecessary in this case for the court to determine that the agency made diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship. While ordinarily such a determination must be made before the court can find permanent neglect (see, Social Services Law § 384-b; Matter of Sheila G., 61 NY2d 368), the appellant mother here admitted permanent neglect (see, Matter of Patricia O., 175 AD2d 870). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Jamaal DeQuan M.
24 A.D.3d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Saquan L.E.
19 A.D.3d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Aaron S. Orange County Department of Social Services
15 A.D.3d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re David M-H.
305 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Fard Saleem G.
297 A.D.2d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re Sarah TT.
294 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re Dasheen S.
254 A.D.2d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re Antoine McK.
246 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re James Carton K.
245 A.D.2d 374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D.2d 422, 652 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-regina-c-nyappdiv-1997.