In re Antoine McK.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Antoine McK.

246 A.D.2d 596, 667 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D.2d 596 (In re Antoine McK.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Antoine McK., 246 A.D.2d 596, 667 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), entered January 28, 1997, which, upon fact-finding orders of the Family Court, Albany County, dated September 6, 1996, and September 27, 1996, respectively, upon the appellant’s admission that he had com[597]*597mitted acts which if committed by an adult would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and attempted assault in the third degree, respectively, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding orders dated September 6,1996, and September 27,1996, respectively.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in placing the appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of one year (e.g., Matter of Peter S., 241 AD2d 457). The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People ex. rel. Cusano v Leone, 43 NY2d 665, 668, n 2; Matter of James Carton K., 235 AD2d 422; Matter of Bridget TT., 203 AD2d 623). Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), entered January 28, 1997, which, upon fact-finding orders of the Family Court, Albany County, dated September 6, 1996, and September 27, 1996, respectively, upon the appellant’s admission that he had com[597]*597mitted acts which if committed by an adult would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and attempted assault in the third degree, respectively, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding orders dated September 6,1996, and September 27,1996, respectively.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in placing the appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of one year (e.g., Matter of Peter S., 241 AD2d 457). The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People ex. rel. Cusano v Leone, 43 NY2d 665, 668, n 2; Matter of James Carton K., 235 AD2d 422; Matter of Bridget TT., 203 AD2d 623). Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 596, 667 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antoine-mck-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack