in Re R. Wayne Johnson

135 S.W.3d 764, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 649, 2004 WL 98635
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 22, 2004·No. 01-04-00011-CV·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On January 12, 2004, relator R. Wayne Johnson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus complaining of Montgomery County District Clerk Barbara Gladden Adamick.

A court of appeals or a justice of the court has jurisdiction to issue writs — other than writs of mandamus against a district or county court judge in the court of appeals district — only when necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the appellate court. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon Supp.2004). Because (1) Montgomery County is in the Ninth Court of Appeals District, not in the First Court of Appeals District, (2) this is not a petition requesting this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against a district or county court judge, and (3) this is not a petition to enforce this Court’s jurisdiction, we have no subject-matter jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus directed at Clerk Adam-ick. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.201(b), (j) (Vernon Supp.2004).

Without reaching the merits of Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandamus, we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re R. Wayne Johnson, 135 S.W.3d 764, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 649, 2004 WL 98635 (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

135 S.W.3d 764 (in Re R. Wayne Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Harrison
399 S.W.3d 348 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
in Re Ivan C. Frazier
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007