In Re Quentin Smith v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Quentin Smith v. the State of Texas (In Re Quentin Smith v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00595-CV
In re Quentin Smith
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Applicant Quentin Smith, an inmate in the Comal County Jail, has filed a pro se
original application for writ of habeas corpus in which he requests immediate release under article
17.151 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and contends that his prosecution and bail amount
are retaliation for his exercise of his First Amendment rights, that he is being subjected to cruel
and unusual punishment in violation of article 1.09 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and that
the State is suppressing exculpatory evidence. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 1.09 (prohibiting
excessive bail and fines and cruel and unusual punishment), 17.151, § 1(1) (requiring that
defendant “must be released either on personal bond or by reducing the amount of bail required, if
the state is not ready for trial of the criminal action for which he is being detained within . . .
90 days from the commencement of his detention”).
The original habeas corpus jurisdiction of a court of appeals is limited to cases
where a person’s liberty is restrained because he or she has violated an order, judgment, or decree
in a civil case. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d); In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 n.3 (Tex.
2011) (orig. proceeding). Courts of appeals have no original habeas jurisdiction in criminal matters. In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356–57 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, orig.
proceeding) (per curiam); see Ex parte Braswell, 630 S.W.3d 600, 601–02 (Tex. App.—Waco
2021, orig. proceeding); see also Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
1999, no pet.) (“The courts of appeals have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal
matters; their jurisdiction is appellate only.”). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus
in a criminal case is vested in the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts,
or a judge of those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05; see Ayers, 515 S.W.3d at 356.
Accordingly, we dismiss Smith’s original application for writ of habeas corpus for
want of jurisdiction.
__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis
Filed: July 3, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Quentin Smith v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-quentin-smith-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.