In Re Proving the Will of Berry
102 N.E. 1099, 209 N.Y. 540, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 904
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Proving the Will of Berry, 102 N.E. 1099, 209 N.Y. 540, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 904 (N.Y. 1913).
102 N.E. 1099 (In Re Proving the Will of Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Booge v. Reinicke
114 P.2d 427 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
In re Gordon
256 A.D. 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
In re the Estate of Innerfield
153 Misc. 706 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)
In re the Estate of Stulman
146 Misc. 861 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re Hornidge
135 Misc. 170 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1929)
In re Vert
126 Misc. 220 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1925)
In re a Judicial Construction of the Last Will & Testament of Kuhrasch
124 Misc. 117 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1924)
Woolley v. Hutchins
114 Misc. 11 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)
Maynard v. Maynard
108 Misc. 362 (New York Supreme Court, 1919)
In re the Appraisal for Taxation of the Estate of Hathaway
103 Misc. 360 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1918)
In Re the Probate of Will of Hitchcock
118 N.E. 220 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Benedict v. Salmon
177 A.D. 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
In re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of McQueen
18 Mills Surr. 411 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1917)
In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Hitchcock
176 A.D. 326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)