In re Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Gordon

256 A.D. 999, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5827

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 999 (In re Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gordon, 256 A.D. 999, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk county, adjudging that the residuary [1000]*1000estate of the deceased, Nettie M. Roe, did not pass under paragraph “ Nineteenth ” of the will to John James Roe, or his children, but passed in trust to the predecessor of the respondent Patehogue Citizens Bank and Trust Company, to be used as provided by paragraph “ Twentieth ” of the will, and vacating a stay, affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Durand, 250 N. Y. 45, 53; Matter of Berry, 154 App. Div. 509; affd., 209 N. Y. 540.) Order denying petitioners’ motion for resettlement of the decree, and order denying petitioners’ application for an allowance for counsel fees and necessary disbursements affirmed, without costs. Present —Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk county, adjudging that the residuary [1000]*1000estate of the deceased, Nettie M. Roe, did not pass under paragraph “ Nineteenth ” of the will to John James Roe, or his children, but passed in trust to the predecessor of the respondent Patehogue Citizens Bank and Trust Company, to be used as provided by paragraph “ Twentieth ” of the will, and vacating a stay, affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Durand, 250 N. Y. 45, 53; Matter of Berry, 154 App. Div. 509; affd., 209 N. Y. 540.) Order denying petitioners’ motion for resettlement of the decree, and order denying petitioners’ application for an allowance for counsel fees and necessary disbursements affirmed, without costs. Present —Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 999, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gordon-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack