In re Gordon

256 A.D. 999, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5827

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk county, adjudging that the residuary [1000] estate of the deceased, Nettie M. Roe, did not pass under paragraph “ Nineteenth ” of the will to John James Roe, or his children, but passed in trust to the predecessor of the respondent Patehogue Citizens Bank and Trust Company, to be used as provided by paragraph “ Twentieth ” of the will, and vacating a stay, affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Durand, 250 N. Y. 45, 53; Matter of Berry, 154 App. Div. 509; affd., 209 N. Y. 540.) Order denying petitioners’ motion for resettlement of the decree, and order denying petitioners’ application for an allowance for counsel fees and necessary disbursements affirmed, without costs. Present —Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Gordon, 256 A.D. 999, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 999 (In re Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Proving the Will of Berry
102 N.E. 1099 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
Matter of Durand
164 N.E. 737 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Berry
154 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)