in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellate case name: In re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay
Appellate case number: 01-22-00427-CV
Trial court case number: 2021-43287
Trial court: 157th District Court
Date motion filed: June 28, 2022
Party filing motion: Relators
On June 28, 2022, relators filed their “10th Motion Filed Under Rule 49.1.” We interpret relators’ motion as a motion for rehearing of our June 23, 2022 memorandum opinion denying mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), 52.9. It is ordered that relators’ motion for rehearing is denied. All pending motions are overruled as moot.
Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack________ Acting for the Court
Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Hightower.
Date: ____July 7, 2022_____
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay (in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.