in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 23, 2022·No. 01-22-00427-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 23, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00427-CV ——————————— IN RE PROBIR K. BONDYOPADHYAY AND MADHURI BONDYOPADHYAY, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, have

filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging the local administrative court’s

ruling, which denied their requests to institute a new suit.1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE § 11.102(f).

1 The underlying case is Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay v. Anthony Scott Vincent, cause number 2021-43287, pending in the 157th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Tanya Garrison presiding. We deny the mandamus petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending

motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Hightower.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay (in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 11.102
Texas CP § 11.102(f)