in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay
This text of in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay (in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 23, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00427-CV ——————————— IN RE PROBIR K. BONDYOPADHYAY AND MADHURI BONDYOPADHYAY, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators, Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, have
filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging the local administrative court’s
ruling, which denied their requests to institute a new suit.1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. &
REM. CODE § 11.102(f).
1 The underlying case is Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay v. Anthony Scott Vincent, cause number 2021-43287, pending in the 157th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Tanya Garrison presiding. We deny the mandamus petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Hightower.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-probir-k-bondyopadhyay-and-madhuri-bondyopadhyay-texapp-2022.