In re Powell

Third Circuit

In re Powell

216 F.2d 752

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 26, 1954·No. No. 11372·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case presents the question whether on á given date Edwin R. Powell and Joshua E. Turner were farmers and thus immune to an involuntary adjudication of bankruptcy under Section 4 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 22. The referee found that they were not. This finding was approved by the district judge who set out his reasons in a thoroughly considered opinion. In re Powell, D.C.D.Del.1954, 121 F.Supp. 33. There is, in our judgment, ample evidence to support his conclusion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case presents the question whether on á given date Edwin R. Powell and Joshua E. Turner were farmers and thus immune to an involuntary adjudication of bankruptcy under Section 4 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 22. The referee found that they were not. This finding was approved by the district judge who set out his reasons in a thoroughly considered opinion. In re Powell, D.C.D.Del.1954, 121 F.Supp. 33. There is, in our judgment, ample evidence to support his conclusion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

In re Powell, 216 F.2d 752 (3d Cir. 1954).

Pincite

216 F.2d 752 (In re Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

In the Matter of Edwin R. Powell and Joshua E. Turner, Individually, and the Partnership Known as Powell & Turner, Composed of Edwin R. Powell and Joshua E. Turner, Alleged Bankrupts. Edwin R. Powell and Joshua E. Turner, Individually, and the Partnership Known as Powell & Turner, Composed of Edwin R. Powell and Joshua E. Turner

216 F.2d 752 (Third Circuit, 1954)

Opinion

Related