In re Polsley

158 P.3d 328, 282 Kan. 727, 2006 Kan. LEXIS 721
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Polsley. Read the opinion of the Court — 277 Kan. 565
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided December 13, 2006·No. No. 91,296·Published

Opinion

On March 19, 2004, this court suspended the respondent, Kathryn S. Polsley, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 2 years. See In re Polsley, 277 Kan. 565, 86 P.3d 531 (2004). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action, to comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 314), and to resolve any CLE or attorney license fee problems.

The Disciplinary Administrator has filed a report verifying that the respondent has fully complied with the conditions imposed upon her by this court.

This court, having reviewed the files and recommendation of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the respondent, Kathryn S. Polsley, should be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas as of the date of this order. The Clerk of the Appellate Courts is directed to enter respondent’s name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the official Kansas Reports.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Polsley, 158 P.3d 328, 282 Kan. 727, 2006 Kan. LEXIS 721 (kan 2006).

158 P.3d 328 (In re Polsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Polsley
86 P.3d 531 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2004)