In re Pink

265 A.D. 832, 38 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6016

Opinion

Assuming, without deciding, that the opinion filed by the Special Term was in effect a decision and that the order entered thereon was in effect an interlocutory judgment, we discern no variance between the order sought to be resettled and the opinion decision. In this view we are in agreement with the Special Term. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Pink, 265 A.D. 832, 38 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 832 (In re Pink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.