In re Pink
This text of 259 A.D. 1025 (In re Pink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceedings under section 1077-e of the Civil Practice Act to direct payment, in reduction of past due principal of mortgage, of the surplus, if any, produced by mortgaged property. Orders denying appellant’s motions to vacate notices of hearing before an official referee and to deny petitioner’s applications to pay over surplus income and to vacate orders of reference affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1025, 21 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pink-nyappdiv-1940.