In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Liability Litigation

N.D. California

In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Liability Litigation

DecidedFebruary 10, 2026

Docket3:26-cv-00853

StatusUnknown

This text of In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Liability Litigation (In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Liability Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Liability Litigation, (N.D. Cal. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

CERTIFIED FROM THE RECORD __02/10/2026 □□□ UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 2 Brandy S:Lonchena — MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION YW “Zh Snel □□ PP Deputy Clerk” □ IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI-LEVEL PAP, SSrict TE AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3014

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -117)

On October 8, 2021, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 568 F.Supp.3d 1408 (J.P.M.L. 2021). Since that time, 343 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Judge Conti. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Western District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of October 8, 2021, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. — Feb 10, 2026 peel. Q. kocbend chaten ermres MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Marcella R. Lockert Acting Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI−LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3014 SCHEDULE CTO−117 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 26−00853 Sexton v. Philips RS North America, LLC et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CERTIFIED FROM THE RECORD __02/10/2026 □□□ UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 2 Brandy S:Lonchena — MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION YW “Zh Snel □□ PP Deputy Clerk” □ IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI-LEVEL PAP, SSrict TE AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3014

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -117)

On October 8, 2021, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 568 F.Supp.3d 1408 (J.P.M.L. 2021). Since that time, 343 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Judge Conti. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Western District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of October 8, 2021, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. — Feb 10, 2026 peel. Q. kocbend chaten ermres MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Marcella R. Lockert Acting Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI−LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3014 SCHEDULE CTO−117 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 26−00853 Sexton v. Philips RS North America, LLC et al

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Liability Litigation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-philips-recalled-cpap-bi-level-pap-and-mechanical-ventilator-cand-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack