In re Peterman

829 A.2d 670
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 30, 2003
DocketNo. 758 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 829 A.2d 670 (In re Peterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Peterman, 829 A.2d 670 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2003, a Rule having been entered upon Roger Clark Peterman by this Court on February 28, 2003, to show cause why he should not be disbarred and, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Roger Clark Peterman is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth retroactive to August 1, 2002, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Justice CASTILLE and SAYLOR respectfully dissent from the imposition of disbarment and would only impose reciprocal discipline as announced by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 A.2d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-peterman-pa-2003.