In re Peterman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Peterman

806 A.2d 850

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 1, 2002

DocketNo. 758 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 806 A.2d 850 (In re Peterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Peterman, 806 A.2d 850 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this [851]*851Court on June 24, 2002, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., to show cause why Roger Clark Peterman should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Roger Clark Peterman is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this [851]*851Court on June 24, 2002, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., to show cause why Roger Clark Peterman should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Roger Clark Peterman is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

806 A.2d 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-peterman-pa-2002.