In re Peterman
806 A.2d 860, 569 Pa. 567, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2101
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 1, 2002·No. No. 758 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this Court on June 24, 2002, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., to show cause why Roger Clark Peter-man should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Roger Clark Peterman is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Peterman, 806 A.2d 860, 569 Pa. 567, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2101 (Pa. 2002).
806 A.2d 860 (In re Peterman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Com. v. Pinson, P.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Com. v. Nelson, E.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Richard, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017