In re Patricia O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Patricia O.

279 A.D.2d 895, 719 N.Y.S.2d 615, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 895 (In re Patricia O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Patricia O., 279 A.D.2d 895, 719 N.Y.S.2d 615, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Coccoma, J.), entered February 23, 1999, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to adjudicate respondent’s children to be neglected.

Based upon respondent’s admission of certain allegations of the petition filed pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Family Court found respondent’s children to be neglected and, after a dispositional hearing, the children were placed with their paternal grandmother for a six-month period under petitioner’s supervision. Respondent appealed and his assigned counsel seeks to be relieved of the assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues. Our review of the record discloses that the finding of neglect was based upon respondent’s knowing and voluntary admission and that the placement ordered by Family Court was the disposition requested by respondent at the conclusion of the dispositional hearing. In addition, the order of disposition has expired. Accordingly, we agree with counsel that no nonfrivolous issues exist and grant his application to be relieved of his assignment (see, Matter of Amber EE., 245 AD2d 895; see also, Anders v California, 386 US 738).

[896]*896Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Coccoma, J.), entered February 23, 1999, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to adjudicate respondent’s children to be neglected.

Based upon respondent’s admission of certain allegations of the petition filed pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Family Court found respondent’s children to be neglected and, after a dispositional hearing, the children were placed with their paternal grandmother for a six-month period under petitioner’s supervision. Respondent appealed and his assigned counsel seeks to be relieved of the assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues. Our review of the record discloses that the finding of neglect was based upon respondent’s knowing and voluntary admission and that the placement ordered by Family Court was the disposition requested by respondent at the conclusion of the dispositional hearing. In addition, the order of disposition has expired. Accordingly, we agree with counsel that no nonfrivolous issues exist and grant his application to be relieved of his assignment (see, Matter of Amber EE., 245 AD2d 895; see also, Anders v California, 386 US 738).

[896]*896Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 895, 719 N.Y.S.2d 615, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patricia-o-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack