In re Amber EE.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Amber EE.

245 A.D.2d 895, 666 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13604

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1997·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Ray, J.), entered October 3, 1996, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to find respondent in violation of a prior order of protection.

Respondent admitted to violating an order of protection directing that he have no contact with Amber EE. and was sentenced, as agreed, to four months in jail. Respondent’s counsel seeks to be relieved of representing respondent on appeal on the basis that no nonfrivolous issues exist. Upon our review of the record and brief submitted by respondent’s counsel, we agree. Consequently, counsel’s application to be relieved of her assignment is granted (see, Matter of Dart v Howell, 237 AD2d 825; see also, Anders v California, 386 US 738).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Ray, J.), entered October 3, 1996, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to find respondent in violation of a prior order of protection.

Respondent admitted to violating an order of protection directing that he have no contact with Amber EE. and was sentenced, as agreed, to four months in jail. Respondent’s counsel seeks to be relieved of representing respondent on appeal on the basis that no nonfrivolous issues exist. Upon our review of the record and brief submitted by respondent’s counsel, we agree. Consequently, counsel’s application to be relieved of her assignment is granted (see, Matter of Dart v Howell, 237 AD2d 825; see also, Anders v California, 386 US 738).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

In re Amber EE., 245 A.D.2d 895, 666 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

245 A.D.2d 895 (In re Amber EE.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related