In re Parisi
This text of 8 Misc. 2d 260 (In re Parisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The three warrants filed are for amounts of contributions to the State Unemployment Insurance Fund due from petitioner, unpaid.
Although these contributions are not called “ taxes ” in the Labor Law, they have been held to be taxes. (W. H. H. Chamberlin, Inc. v. Andrews, 271 N. Y. 1, affd. 299 U. S. 515; Matter [261]*261of Bank of Manhattan Co. [Murphy], 293 N. Y. 515; Guaranty Trust Co. v. State of New York, 299 N. Y. 295.)
Whether or not unpaid contributions of this character are “ taxes ” within the meaning of section 35 of title 11 of the United States Code is a Federal question. If they are such they are not provable debts and were not discharged by the petitioner’s bankruptcy discharge. Neither counsel has, nor have I, been able to find a controlling precedent.
However, on the basis of the language of section 35 and of the cases hereinafter cited I have concluded that these contribution are “taxes” within the meaning of the bankruptcy statute (Matter of Lange Co., 159 F. 586; City of New York v. Feiring, 313 U. S. 283; United States v. New York, 315 U. S. 510) and were not discharged.
The motion is denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Misc. 2d 260, 167 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-parisi-nysupct-1957.