In re Owens

517 S.E.2d 605, 350 N.C. 656, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2340, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 726
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 23, 1999·No. No.122PA98·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated therein. But see Act of July 9, 1999, ch. 267, 1999 N.C. Sess. Laws- (codifying “journalists’ testimonial privilege” as N.C.G.S. § 8-53.9, effective 1 October 1999).

AFFIRMED.

[657]*657Justices Martin and Wainwright did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Owens, 517 S.E.2d 605, 350 N.C. 656, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2340, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 726 (N.C. 1999).

517 S.E.2d 605 (In re Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Owens
517 S.E.2d 605 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)