In Re Oscar Roldan-Zapata, United States of America v. Oscar Roldan-Zapata, Pedro Osario-Serna and Eric Akiva

872 F.2d 18, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4709
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 30, 1989·No. 980, Docket 89-3008·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to review an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Costantino, J., denying a motion to recuse.

We place less significance than does Judge Newman in his dissent on the district judge’s gratuitous remark, “I don’t rec[]use myself from anything.” We believe that the judge exercised discretion in deciding whether he should recuse himself in this matter.

Therefore, the petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking recusal of the district judge from a pending criminal case, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Oscar Roldan-Zapata, United States of America v. Oscar Roldan-Zapata, Pedro Osario-Serna and Eric Akiva, 872 F.2d 18, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4709 (2d Cir. 1989).

872 F.2d 18 (In Re Oscar Roldan-Zapata, United States of America v. Oscar Roldan-Zapata, Pedro Osario-Serna and Eric Akiva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Carroll
292 B.R. 472 (D. Connecticut, 2003)
Gwaltney v. Stone
564 A.2d 498 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)