In Re Opinion of the Justices No. 324

511 So. 2d 505, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4409
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJuly 17, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 511 So. 2d 505 (In Re Opinion of the Justices No. 324) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Opinion of the Justices No. 324, 511 So. 2d 505, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4409 (Ala. 1987).

Opinion

To the Honorable Members of the House of Representatives of Alabama

The State House

Montgomery, Alabama

Dear Representatives:

We are in receipt of House Resolution 434, which reads:

“HR 434 REQUESTING ADVISORY OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT.
“BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE, That we respectfully request the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, or a majority of them, to give this body their written opinions on the following important constitutional questions which have arisen concerning the pending bill HB 713, copies of which are attached to this resolution and made a part hereof by reference.
“1. HB 713 imposes certain environmental protection fees upon motor fuels and provides that such fees shall be held in a revolving trust fund. Do the provisions of HB 713 which prescribe the manner in which monies from this trust fund shall be expended violate the provisions of Amendment 93 or any other provision of the Constitution of Alabama 1901?
“2. Is HB 713 a revenue raising measure which should not be passed during the last five days of the legislative session under Article IV, Section 70 of the Constitution of Alabama 1901?
“RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Clerk of the House is hereby directed to send sufficient true copies of said pending bill to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Alabama, and to transmit this request to the Justices of the Supreme Court forthwith upon adoption of this resolution.”

House Resolution 434 requests this Court's opinion regarding whether House Bill 713 violates the provisions of Amendment 93 of the Constitution of 1901 and whether House Bill 713 is a revenue bill which should not be passed during the last five days of the legislative session under Article IV, Section 70, of the Alabama Con[506]*506stitution of 1901. House Bill 434 reads as follows:

“A BILL

“TO BE ENTITLED

“AN ACT

“To establish the Alabama Groundwater Protection Trust Fund; to provide for a disposition of the environmental protection fees collected for returning polluted groundwater to a quality comparable to its previous state; to establish an advisory board to advise the Department of Environmental Management on the investment of the fund, and other related matters; to create an incentive program through a two-year grace period to encourage the reporting and cleanup of leaking underground storage tanks; to establish and satisfy financial responsibility requirements for underground storage tank owners as required by federal law; to provide for payment of third party claims and cleanup costs caused by leaking underground storage tanks; to provide for an insurance pool for those unable to secure cleanup and/or liability insurance, and to provide for disposition of the Fund.

“The legislature of the State of Alabama finds and declares that certain lands of Alabama constitute unique and delicately balanced resources; that the protection of these resources is vital to the economy of this state; and that the preservation of groundwater is a matter of the highest urgency and priority as these waters provide a primary source of potable water in this state; that such use can only be served effectively by maintaining the quality of groundwater in as close to a pristine condition as possible, taking into account multiple use accommodations necessary to provide the broadest possible promotion of public and private interests.

“The legislature further finds and declares that the storage and transportation of motor fuels within the jurisdiction of this state poses [sic] threats of damage to the environment of the state, to citizens of the state, and to other interests deriving livelihood from the state; and that such hazards have occurred in the past, are now occurring, and will continue to occur. Discharges from underground tanks pose a significant threat to the quality of ground-waters of this state.

“The legislature further finds that where contamination of groundwater has occurred, remedial measures have often been delayed for long periods while determinations as to liability and the extent of liability are made; that such delays result in the continuation and intensification of the threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, in greater damages to the environment, and in significantly higher costs to contain and remove the contamination; and that adequate financial resources must be readily available to provide for the expeditious supply of safe and reliable alternative sources of potable water to affected persons and to provide a means for investigation and cleanup at contamination sites without delay.

“The legislature intends for this Act to provide evidence of financial responsibility under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 and other federal laws.

“BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:

“Section 1. This act may be cited as the ‘Alabama Groundwater Protection Trust Fund Act.’

“Section 2. For the purposes of this act, unless otherwise indicated, the following terms shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section:

“(a) ‘Commission’ means the Alabama Environmental Management Commission.

“(b) ‘Department’ means the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.

“(c) ‘Director’ means the Director of the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.

“(d) ‘Groundwater’ means water located beneath the land surface located wholly or partially within the boundaries of the state.

“(e) ‘Owner of An Underground Storage Tank’ means:

[507]*507“(1) in the case of any underground storage tank in use on the date of enactment of this act, or brought into use after that date, any person who owns an underground storage tank used for the storage, use, or dispensing of motor fuels, and

“(2) in the case of an underground storage tank in use before the date of enactment of this act, but no longer in use on the date of enactment of this act, any person who owned such tank immediately before the discontinuation of its use, and

“(3) any person who operates an underground storage tank used for the storage, use or dispensing of motor fuels.

“(f) ‘Person’ means any natural person, any firm, association, partnership, corporation, trust, the state and any agency of the state, governmental entity, the United States and any agency of the United States, a consortium, a joint venture, a commercial entity and any other legal entity.

“(g) ‘Motor Fuels’ shall be defined as all grades of gasoline including gasohol, number 1 diesel, number 2 diesel, kerosene and all aviation fuels.

“(h) ‘Underground storage tanks’ means any one or combination of tanks (including pipes connected thereto) used to contain an accumulation of motor fuels, and the volume of which (including the volume of the underground pipes connected thereto) is ten percent or more beneath the surface of the ground. Such term does not include any:

“(1) Farm or residential tank of 1,100 gallons or less capacity used for storing motor fuel for noncommercial purposes;

“(2) Tank used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the premises where stored;

“(3) Septic tank;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion of the Justices
69 So. 3d 847 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2011)
Alabama Department of Corrections v. Merritt
74 So. 3d 1 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
One Stop, Inc. v. State Department of Revenue
814 So. 2d 278 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 So. 2d 505, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-opinion-of-the-justices-no-324-ala-1987.