In re Opinion 33 of the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law
730 A.2d 1289, 158 N.J. 681, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 384
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Opinion 33 of the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 N.J. 63 →
Opinion
This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the notice of petition for review of Opinion 33 of the Supreme Court Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, which holds that attorneys who are not admitted to practice law in New Jersey are engaging in the unauthorized practice of law when they provide legal services to New Jersey governmental entities in connection with the issuance of state and municipal bonds, is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Opinion 33 of the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, 730 A.2d 1289, 158 N.J. 681, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 384 (N.J. 1999).
730 A.2d 1289 (In re Opinion 33 of the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.