In re Olivarius

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Olivarius

106 A.D.3d 1262, 965 N.Y.S.2d 896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.3d 1262 (In re Olivarius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Olivarius, 106 A.D.3d 1262, 965 N.Y.S.2d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2008. She maintains an office for the practice of law in London, England. By decision dated April 5, 2012, this Court revoked respondent’s application for admission, but without prejudice to respondent’s renewal of her application for admission (Matter of Olivarius, 94 AD3d 1224 [2012]). Respondent has submitted a renewed application, which was duly investigated by this Court’s Committee on Character and Fitness (see 22 NYCRR 805.1). The Committee recommends approval of the renewed application. We adopt the Committee’s recommendation, approve the renewed application, and direct the Clerk of the Court to admit respondent to the bar, including scheduling the administration of the attorney’s oath of office to her (see Judiciary Law § 466). Lahtinen, J.E, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s renewed application for admission is approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2008. She maintains an office for the practice of law in London, England. By decision dated April 5, 2012, this Court revoked respondent’s application for admission, but without prejudice to respondent’s renewal of her application for admission (Matter of Olivarius, 94 AD3d 1224 [2012]). Respondent has submitted a renewed application, which was duly investigated by this Court’s Committee on Character and Fitness (see 22 NYCRR 805.1). The Committee recommends approval of the renewed application. We adopt the Committee’s recommendation, approve the renewed application, and direct the Clerk of the Court to admit respondent to the bar, including scheduling the administration of the attorney’s oath of office to her (see Judiciary Law § 466). Lahtinen, J.E, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s renewed application for admission is approved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.3d 1262, 965 N.Y.S.2d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-olivarius-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack