In re O'Connell

California Supreme Court

In re O'Connell

182 Cal. 786

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 16, 1920

DocketCrim. No. 2306

StatusPublished

This text of 182 Cal. 786 (In re O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re O'Connell, 182 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1920).

Pincite

Opinions

THE COURT.

—The facts in this case are in all material respects the same as those in the Matter of Biccardi, ante, p. 675, [189 Pac. 694], The conviction of the accused, was in the United States district court of the northern district of California, and was for conspiring to violate the acts of Congress of May 18, 1917, and June 15, 1917, and the case is pending on writ of error in the United States supreme court.

It is ordered that action upon the certified copy of the judgment presented be deferred pending the determination of the appeal of the attorney from such judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

—The facts in this case are in all material respects the same as those in the Matter of Biccardi, ante, p. 675, [189 Pac. 694], The conviction of the accused, was in the United States district court of the northern district of California, and was for conspiring to violate the acts of Congress of May 18, 1917, and June 15, 1917, and the case is pending on writ of error in the United States supreme court.

It is ordered that action upon the certified copy of the judgment presented be deferred pending the determination of the appeal of the attorney from such judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 Cal. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-oconnell-cal-1920.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack