In re O.C.
623 S.E.2d 587
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 3, 2005·No. No. 465P05.·Published·Cited by 61 cases
Opinion
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of August 2005 by Respondent (Chiquetta C.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re O.C., 623 S.E.2d 587 (N.C. 2005).
623 S.E.2d 587 (In re O.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re K.R.C.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2020
In re Z.A.M.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2020
In re: E.B.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019
In re S.H-K.J.L.
823 S.E.2d 695 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
In re P.R.T.
823 S.E.2d 172 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
In re: Z.D.
812 S.E.2d 668 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
In re: M.B., A.B.
805 S.E.2d 390 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
In re: L.L.O.
799 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
In re B.A.S.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re M.S.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re Z.P-S.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re H.R.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re D.C.
737 S.E.2d 182 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
In re J.K.C.
721 S.E.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
In re D.H.H.
208 N.C. App. 549 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
In Matter of Ssj
689 S.E.2d 245 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
In Matter of Mt
688 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
In Matter of Daa
688 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
In the Matter of Bmj
683 S.E.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
In re S.C.H.
682 S.E.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)