In RE NOMINATION OF McINTYRE
This text of 770 A.2d 326 (In RE NOMINATION OF McINTYRE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Nomination Petitions of Daniel McINTYRE, Democratic Nomination for Judge, Court of Common Pleas.
Objector: Samuel Mahfood.
In re Nomination Petitions of Daniel McIntyre, Republican Nomination for Judge, Court of Common Pleas.
Objector: James T. Weikel.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
*327 Robert Matthew Owsiany, Pittsburgh, for appellant, Daniel McIntyre.
James Paul Coletta, Carnegie, for appellees, Samuel Mahfood and James T. Weikel.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW this 4th day of May, 2001, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. The Application for Stay Pending Appeal and Motion for Expedited Argument are DISMISSED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
770 A.2d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nomination-of-mcintyre-pa-2001.