In Re Nollman v. Rawie

Missouri Court of Appeals

In Re Nollman v. Rawie

297 S.W.3d 666, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1690, 2009 WL 4279438

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2009·No. ED 92782·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcella Hodgins (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis (“trial court”). The trial court granted Brent Rawie’s (“Father”) Motion to Modify and awarded him residential physical custody of the parties’ minor child, E.L.N. (“Child”), and ordered Mother to pay Father $7,500 in attorney’s fees. Rule 84.16(b). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcella Hodgins (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis (“trial court”). The trial court granted Brent Rawie’s (“Father”) Motion to Modify and awarded him residential physical custody of the parties’ minor child, E.L.N. (“Child”), and ordered Mother to pay Father $7,500 in attorney’s fees. Rule 84.16(b). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In Re Nollman v. Rawie, 297 S.W.3d 666, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1690, 2009 WL 4279438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

297 S.W.3d 666 (In Re Nollman v. Rawie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related