Hansen v. Covington Place L.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hansen v. Covington Place L.P.

297 S.W.3d 666, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1701, 2009 WL 4279441

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2009·No. ED 92840·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nicole Hansen appeals the trial court’s judgment finding that the exculpatory clause in the lease agreement between Hansen and lessor Covington Place L.P. was valid. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nicole Hansen appeals the trial court’s judgment finding that the exculpatory clause in the lease agreement between Hansen and lessor Covington Place L.P. was valid. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hansen v. Covington Place L.P., 297 S.W.3d 666, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1701, 2009 WL 4279441 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

297 S.W.3d 666 (Hansen v. Covington Place L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related