in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 449 S.W.3d 625
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 17, 2013·No. 01-13-00412-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-13-00412-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 2011-43366 Style: In re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC

Date motion filed*: May 15, 2013 Type of motion: Emergency Motion to Stay Party filing motion: Relator Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: The court grants the motion to stay all proceedings in the trial court except for discovery unrelated to photographs. No further hearings on discovery disputes may be conducted during the pendency of this mandamus proceeding.

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: May 17, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC (in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.