in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 449 S.W.3d 625
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 18, 2013·No. 01-13-00412-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 18, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00412-CV ——————————— IN RE NOBLE DRILLING (JIM THOMPSON) LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson) LLC has filed a petition for writ of

mandamus, challenging the trial court’s order striking Noble’s pleadings and

setting a hearing to determine Salvador Maciel’s damages. 1 Upon the filing of

Noble’s petition, the Court stayed the damages hearing and requested that Maciel

1 The underlying case is Maciel v. Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson) LLC et al., No. 2011-43366, in the 215th District Court of Harris County, the Hon. Elaine H. Palmer presiding. 1 respond to the petition. Noble and Maciel have since agreed that the petition

should be conditionally granted. According, we lift the stay, conditionally grant

Noble’s petition for writ of mandamus, and direct the trial court to set aside its

order striking Noble’s pleadings. We are confident the trial court will promptly

comply, and our writ will issue only if the trial court does not comply. All

outstanding motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC (in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.