In re Nettles-Nickerson

750 N.W.2d 560, 481 Mich. 321
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 13, 2008
DocketDocket No. 133929
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 750 N.W.2d 560 (In re Nettles-Nickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Nettles-Nickerson, 750 N.W.2d 560, 481 Mich. 321 (Mich. 2008).

Opinions

Memorandum Opinion.

On June 11, 2008, the Court heard oral argument from the parties concerning the Judicial Tenure Commission’s findings and recommendations in this matter. The Judicial Tenure Commission’s Decision and Recommendation for Order of Discipline is attached as an exhibit to this opinion.

We adopt in part the recommendations made by the Judicial Tenure Commission and order that the respondent is removed from office, effective immediately, on the basis of the following misconduct:

(1) Respondent twice made false statements under oath in connection with her divorce proceeding (Count 1);
(2) Respondent made and solicited other false statements while not under oath, including the submission of fabricated evidence to the Judicial Tenure Commission (Count II);
[323]*323(3) Respondent improperly listed cases on the no-progress docket (Count III);
(4) Respondent was absent excessively and engaged in belated commencement of proceedings, untimely adjournments, and improper docket management (Count IV);
(5) Respondent allowed a social relationship to influence the release of a criminal defendant from probation (Count VI); and
(6) Respondent recklessly flaunted her judicial office (Count IX).

See page 2 of the Judicial Tenure Commission’s Decision and Recommendation for Order of Discipline in the attached exhibit.

The respondent is no longer a judicial officer and will not be an incumbent at the time of the 2008 30th Circuit Court election. We decline the Judicial Tenure Commission’s additional recommendation to conditionally suspend the respondent.

On the basis of Counts I and II, costs are imposed on the respondent judge in the amount of $12,000. MCR 9.205(B).

This judgment is effective immediately.

Taylor, C.J., and Cavanagh, Kelly, Corrigan, Young, and MARKMAN, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Tracy E. Green, Judge
Michigan Supreme Court, 2023
In re Brennan
929 N.W.2d 290 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2019)
in Re Hon J Cedric Simpson
Michigan Supreme Court, 2017
in Re Hon Bruce U Morrow
Michigan Supreme Court, 2014
In re Morrow
854 N.W.2d 89 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2014)
in Re Hon Wade H McCree
Michigan Supreme Court, 2014
In re McCREE
495 Mich. 51 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2014)
in Re Honorable Deborah Ross Adams
Michigan Supreme Court, 2013
In re Adams
833 N.W.2d 897 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2013)
In re James
821 N.W.2d 144 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2012)
in Re Hon Sylvia a James
Michigan Supreme Court, 2012
Grievance Administrator v. Mark H Canady
Michigan Supreme Court, 2011
In Re Servaas
774 N.W.2d 46 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
750 N.W.2d 560, 481 Mich. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nettles-nickerson-mich-2008.