In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation Involving Concrete Pipe

297 F. Supp. 1125, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8867, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,668
CourtUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
DecidedDecember 24, 1968
DocketNo. 12
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 F. Supp. 1125 (In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation Involving Concrete Pipe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation Involving Concrete Pipe, 297 F. Supp. 1125, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8867, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,668 (jpml 1968).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On October 14, 1968 certain plaintiffs in actions then pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Southern District of New York filed a motion with the Panel requesting the transfer of twenty-three cases to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. When this matter was set for hearing, we included four additional cases for consideration for transfer to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania or to another district or districts. One of these additional cases, State of New Mexico, et al. v. American Pipe & Construction Co., et al., is presently pending in the District of New Mexico.

Prior to the hearing, all parties in this case, with one exception, filed a joint motion to transfer it to an appropriate west coast court and to assign it to the Honorable Martin Pence for pretrial purposes.1 Even assuming, as the parties now urge, that the claims in this case arise from the alleged west of the Rockies conspiracy and that some of the factual issues present in it are common to the Ninth Circuit cases, we decline to order such a transfer. In view of the fact that pretrial proceedings are nearly complete in the Ninth Circuit cases, we do not believe that transfer of The State of New 'Mexico case at this time will promote the just and efficient conduct of these actions.

It is therefore ordered that the motion to transfer this case to the Central District of California and to assign it to the Honorable Martin Pence for pretrial proceedings be and the same is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re West of the Rockies Concrete Pipe
303 F. Supp. 507 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 F. Supp. 1125, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8867, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-multidistrict-private-civil-treble-damage-antitrust-litigation-jpml-1968.