In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 417 F. App'x 947
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 2011-M962·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

IDlntteb ~tate~ QCourt of ~peaI~ for !be jfeberaI QCtrmtt

IN RE MORGAN STANLEY, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED, J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, INC., J.P. MORGAN CLEARING CORP., CREDIT SUISSE HOLDINGS (USA), INC., CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA)

LLC, THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., GOLDMAN SACHS EXECUTION & CLEARING LP, SWS GROUP, INC., AND SOUTHWEST SECURITIES, INC., Petitioners.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 962

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 09-CV-0326, Judge Leonard Davis.

IN RE BATS TRADING, INC. (ALSO KNOWN AS BATS ExCHANGE, INC.), THE NASDAQ OMX GROUP, INC., NASDAQ OMX PHLX, INC., INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC, CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, NYSE EURONEXT, NYSE ARCA, INC., NYSE AMEX, LLC, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AUTOMATION

IN RE MORGAN STANLEY 2

CORPORATION, OPTIONS PRICE REPORTING AUTHORITY, BOSTON OPTIONS EXCHANGE GROUP, LLC, CME GROUP, INC., BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC., AND NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC., Petitioners.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 964

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case nos. 09-CV-0327, Judge Leonard Davis.

IN RE THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC., BLOOMBERG L.P. AND INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION,

Petitioners.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 967

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 6:09-CV-00333, Judge Leonard Davis.

ON PETITION

ORDER

3 IN RE MORGAN STANLEY Upon consideration of Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's unopposed motion to withdraw as petitioner , IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

FOR THE COURT

APR 06 2011 lsI Jan Horhaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Daniel A. DeVito, Esq.

Robert A. Cote, Jr., Esq. Keith J. Grady, Esq. Scott F. Partridge, Esq. FILED Rick L. Rambo, Esq. U. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

David R. Francescani, Esq. Michael M. Murray, Esq. APR as 2011 Lynn E. Rzonca, Esq. James H. Shalek, Esq. Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Esq. Constance S. Huttner, Esq. John M. DiMatteo, Esq. Brian E. Moran, Esq. Clerk, United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas s19

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States (In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.