In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States
This text of In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States (In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
IDlntteb ~tate~ QCourt of ~peaI~ for !be jfeberaI QCtrmtt
IN RE MORGAN STANLEY, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED, J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, INC., J.P. MORGAN CLEARING CORP., CREDIT SUISSE HOLDINGS (USA), INC., CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., GOLDMAN SACHS EXECUTION & CLEARING LP, SWS GROUP, INC., AND SOUTHWEST SECURITIES, INC., Petitioners.
Miscellaneous Docket No. 962
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 09-CV-0326, Judge Leonard Davis.
IN RE BATS TRADING, INC. (ALSO KNOWN AS BATS ExCHANGE, INC.), THE NASDAQ OMX GROUP, INC., NASDAQ OMX PHLX, INC., INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC, CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, NYSE EURONEXT, NYSE ARCA, INC., NYSE AMEX, LLC, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AUTOMATION IN RE MORGAN STANLEY 2
CORPORATION, OPTIONS PRICE REPORTING AUTHORITY, BOSTON OPTIONS EXCHANGE GROUP, LLC, CME GROUP, INC., BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC., AND NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC., Petitioners.
Miscellaneous Docket No. 964
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case nos. 09-CV-0327, Judge Leonard Davis.
IN RE THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC., BLOOMBERG L.P. AND INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION, Petitioners.
Miscellaneous Docket No. 967
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 6:09-CV-00333, Judge Leonard Davis.
ON PETITION ORDER 3 IN RE MORGAN STANLEY Upon consideration of Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's unopposed motion to withdraw as peti- tioner, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT
APR 06 2011 lsI Jan Horhaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Daniel A. DeVito, Esq. Robert A. Cote, Jr., Esq. Keith J. Grady, Esq. Scott F. Partridge, Esq. FILED Rick L. Rambo, Esq. U. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT David R. Francescani, Esq. Michael M. Murray, Esq. APR as 2011 Lynn E. Rzonca, Esq. James H. Shalek, Esq. Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Esq. Constance S. Huttner, Esq. John M. DiMatteo, Esq. Brian E. Moran, Esq. Clerk, United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas s19
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Morgan Stanley v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morgan-stanley-v-united-states-cafc-2011.