In re Moras

701 A.2d 435, 151 N.J. 500, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 361

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Moras. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 N.J. 575 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 16, 1997·Published

Opinion

[501]*501ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that HUGO MORAS of SOUTH ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15 (safekeeping property); RPC 5.3(c)(3) (supervision of a non-lawyer employee); and Rule 1:21-6, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HUGO MORAS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[501]*501ORDER

It is ORDERED that HUGO MORAS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Moras, 701 A.2d 435, 151 N.J. 500, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 361 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

701 A.2d 435 (In re Moras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.