In re Moras
This text of 689 A.2d 132 (In re Moras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[598]*598ORDER
This matter having come before the Court by the March 3,1997, order of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part in Ottenberg v. Moras (Docket No. FM 07-24204-81), the order having recited that said court had determined that HUGO L. MORAS of SOUTH ORANGE, an attorney at law of this State, had faded to comply with a prior order to pay child support arrearages;
And the matter having been referred to this Court pursuant to Rule l:20-llA(a) for the suspension of the license of HUGO L. MORAS to practice law in this State;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that HUGO L. MORAS is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that HUGO L. MORAS is restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 A.2d 132, 147 N.J. 597, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moras-nj-1997.