In re Moras

689 A.2d 132, 147 N.J. 597, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 84
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Moras. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 N.J. 575
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 7, 1997·Published

Opinion

[598]*598ORDER

This matter having come before the Court by the March 3,1997, order of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part in Ottenberg v. Moras (Docket No. FM 07-24204-81), the order having recited that said court had determined that HUGO L. MORAS of SOUTH ORANGE, an attorney at law of this State, had faded to comply with a prior order to pay child support arrearages;

And the matter having been referred to this Court pursuant to Rule l:20-llA(a) for the suspension of the license of HUGO L. MORAS to practice law in this State;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HUGO L. MORAS is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that HUGO L. MORAS is restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Moras, 689 A.2d 132, 147 N.J. 597, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 84 (N.J. 1997).

689 A.2d 132 (In re Moras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.