In re Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Moore

2001 Ohio 1328, 93 Ohio St. 3d 212

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 19, 2001

Docket2001-0728

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 1328 (In re Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Moore, 2001 Ohio 1328, 93 Ohio St. 3d 212 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 212.]

IN RE MOORE. [Cite as In re Moore, 2001-Ohio-1328.] Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded to court of appeals for consideration of In re Anderson. (No. 01-728—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 18700. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, Janine Salloum Ashanin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 212.]

IN RE MOORE. [Cite as In re Moore, 2001-Ohio-1328.] Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded to court of appeals for consideration of In re Anderson. (No. 01-728—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 18700. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, Janine Salloum Ashanin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1328, 93 Ohio St. 3d 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moore-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack