In Re Monroy

650 F.3d 1300
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 2011
Docket10-60005
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 650 F.3d 1300 (In Re Monroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Monroy, 650 F.3d 1300 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

650 F.3d 1300 (2011)

In re Arthur Daniel MONROY; Laura Monroy, Debtors,
Home Funds Direct, its assignees and/or successors in interest, Appellant,
v.
Arthur Daniel Monroy; Laura Monroy, Appellees.
In re Christine Paulette Hannon, Debtor,
U.S. Bank, N.A., Appellant,
v.
Christine Paulette Hannon; Elizabeth Rojas, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellees.
In re Anthony John Herrera, Jr.; Mary Ellen Herrera, Debtors,
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Appellant,
v.
Anthony John Herrera, Jr.; Mary Ellen Herrera; Elizabeth F. Rojas, Appellees.

Nos. 10-60005, 10-60017, 10-60018.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 10, 2011.
Filed June 20, 2011.

Lee S. Raphael, Prober & Raphael, Woodland Hills, CA, for the appellants.

M. Erik Clark, Borowitz & Clark, LLP, West Covina, CA, for the appellees.

Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT and PAMELA ANN RYMER, Circuit Judges, and STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, Senior District Judge.[*]

*1301 ORDER

The decisions of the Bankruptcy Courts are affirmed for the reasons given by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its published opinion in In re Herrera, 422 B.R. 698 (9th Cir. BAP 2010), filed January 5, 2010 and attached as an appendix to this order. [Editor's Note: Appendix Omitted for Purposes of Publication][1]

NOTES

[*] The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.

[1] The remand issue raised by the appellants before this court is waived because it was not raised below. In re Cybernetic Servs., Inc., 252 F.3d 1039, 1045 n. 3 (9th Cir.2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ANTONIO F POLVOROSA
D. Nevada, 2020
In Re: Nanette Sisk
962 F.3d 1133 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
In re: Augustine Pena, III
600 B.R. 415 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
In re Sperry
562 B.R. 1 (D. Massachusetts, 2016)
In re Washington
551 B.R. 644 (M.D. Alabama, 2016)
In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. Luedtke
508 B.R. 408 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Jaime Medrano v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb
704 F.3d 661 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
In re: Julie Thuy Vu
Ninth Circuit, 2012

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
650 F.3d 1300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-monroy-ca9-2011.