In re M.M.

2021 Ohio 1695
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 17, 2021
Docket2021-A-0010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 Ohio 1695 (In re M.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re M.M., 2021 Ohio 1695 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

[Cite as In re M.M., 2021-Ohio-1695.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE MATTER OF: : MEMORANDUM OPINION

M.M. : CASE NO. 2021-A-0010

Civil Appeal from the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, Case No. 2020 JC 00002.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Joseph Palazzo, Kurt Law, LLC, 4770 Beidler Road, Willoughby, OH 44094 (For Appellant).

Christopher M. Newcomb, 213 Washington Street, Conneaut, OH 44030 (For Appellee).

Carmen M. Hamper, P.O. Box 2834, Ashtabula, OH 44005 (Guardian ad litem).

MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J.

{¶1} Appellant, Amanda L. Van Alphen, filed a pro se appeal from a March 10,

2021 Magistrate’s Decision/Order, in which the magistrate granted the Ashtabula County

Children Services Board’s motion to terminate temporary custody and grant legal custody

of the minor child to the father.

{¶2} We must determine whether there is a final appealable order since this court

may entertain only those appeals from final judgments or orders. Noble v. Colwell, 44

Ohio St.3d 92, 96 (1989). Under Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, a

judgment of a trial court can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court only if it

constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2003-L-116, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶ 3. If a lower court’s order is not final, then an appellate court does not

have jurisdiction to review the matter, and the matter must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins.

Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989).

{¶1} “* * * [A] magistrate may enter orders without judicial approval if necessary

to regulate the proceedings and if not dispositive of a claim or defense of a party.” See

Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i). This court has stated a magistrate order requires trial court approval

if it disposes of a party’s claim. In the Matter of Dougherty, 11th Dist. Ashtabula No. 2013-

A-0023, 2013-Ohio-2841, ¶ 4.

{¶2} This court has also stated there is no final judgment where a trial court fails

to both adopt the magistrate’s decision and enter judgment stating the relief to be afforded

because “orders are not court orders unless certain formalities are met.” Tran v. Tran,

11th Dist. Geauga No. 2019-G-0228, 2020-Ohio-241, ¶ 7. Only judges, not magistrates,

may terminate claims or actions by entering judgment. Id.

{¶3} Here, the March 10, 2021 magistrate’s decision/order is not a final

appealable order, and this court does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Since it

has not yet received “judicial approval” pursuant Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i), it remains an

interlocutory order and may be reconsidered upon the court’s own motion or that of a

party. Nothing is preventing appellant from obtaining effective relief through an appeal

once the trial court has entered a final judgment in the action.

{¶4} For the foregoing reasons, there is no final appealable order. Accordingly,

the instant appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., MATT LYNCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hornbeck Home Renovations, Inc. v. Crain
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2026
Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Courtney
2021 Ohio 4056 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 Ohio 1695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mm-ohioctapp-2021.