In Re: Missouri
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2247
In Re: VINCENT MISSOURI,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:00-cr-00498-MBS-1)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Missouri, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Vincent Missouri petitions for a writ of mandamus,
challenging the validity of the sentence imposed by the district
court upon revoking his supervised release. He sought an order
from this court correcting the judgment imposed by the district
court. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that
on February 22, 2011, the district court entered an amended
judgment reducing Missouri’s sentence. Because the district
court has corrected the error Missouri seeks to challenge in
this mandamus petition, the petition is moot. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny
the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: Missouri (In Re: Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.