In Re: Missouri

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2011·No. 10-2247·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2247

In Re: VINCENT MISSOURI,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:00-cr-00498-MBS-1)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Missouri, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vincent Missouri petitions for a writ of mandamus,

challenging the validity of the sentence imposed by the district

court upon revoking his supervised release. He sought an order

from this court correcting the judgment imposed by the district

court. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that

on February 22, 2011, the district court entered an amended

judgment reducing Missouri’s sentence. Because the district

court has corrected the error Missouri seeks to challenge in

this mandamus petition, the petition is moot. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny

the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Missouri, (4th Cir. 2011).

In Re: Missouri (In Re: Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.