In re Missouri

420 F. App'x 302
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2247
StatusPublished

This text of 420 F. App'x 302 (In re Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Missouri, 420 F. App'x 302 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Missouri petitions for a writ of mandamus, challenging the validity of the sentence imposed by the district court upon revoking his supervised release. He sought an order from this court correcting the judgment imposed by the district court. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that on February 22, 2011, the district court entered an amended judgment reducing Missouri’s sentence. Because the district court has corrected the error Missouri seeks to challenge in this mandamus petition, the petition is moot. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 F. App'x 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-missouri-ca4-2011.