In Re Miranda
285 B.R. 344
CourtBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
DecidedDecember 4, 2001
DocketNM-01-044, NM-01-047, NM-01-046, NM-01-045, NM-01-048, 99-10346, 00-11356, 99-17081, 98-10524
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases
This text of 285 B.R. 344 (In Re Miranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Miranda, 285 B.R. 344 (bap10 2001).
Opinion
In re Miranda,
Skehen
v.
Miranda.
In re Rivera,
Skehen
v.
Rivera.
Anderson, In re,
Skehen
v.
Anderson.
Bonner, In re,
Skehen
v.
Bonner.
Horlick, In re
Skehen
v.
Horlick.
Byrd, In re
Skehen
v.
Byrd.
Romero, In re,
Skehen
v.
Romero.
Deutsawe, In re,
Skehen
v.
Deutsawe.
C'Hair, In re,
Skehen
v.
C'Hair.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re: Roger Evans v. Kathleen McCallister
69 F.4th 1101 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
Doll v. Goodman
Tenth Circuit, 2023
McCallister v. Evans
D. Idaho, 2022
In re: Doll
D. Colorado, 2021
In re: DOUGLAS JEROME HARMON; CHRISTINE RENNA HARMON
Ninth Circuit, 2021
Roger A. Evans and Lori A. Steedman
D. Idaho, 2021
Rick Warren v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Tenth Circuit, 2021
Julia F Soussis
E.D. New York, 2020
In re Dickens
513 B.R. 906 (E.D. Arkansas, 2014)
In re Miller
501 B.R. 266 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
In re Acevedo
497 B.R. 112 (D. New Mexico, 2013)
In Re Lewis
346 B.R. 89 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
In Re Swanson
285 B.R. 344 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
285 B.R. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miranda-bap10-2001.