In Re Miranda
285 B.R. 344
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2001·No. NM-01-044, NM-01-047, NM-01-046, NM-01-045, NM-01-048, 99-10346, 00-11356, 99-17081, 98-10524·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
In re Miranda,
Skehen
v.
Miranda.
In re Rivera,
Skehen
v.
Rivera.
Anderson, In re,
Skehen
v.
Anderson.
Bonner, In re,
Skehen
v.
Bonner.
Horlick, In re
Skehen
v.
Horlick.
Byrd, In re
Skehen
v.
Byrd.
Romero, In re,
Skehen
v.
Romero.
Deutsawe, In re,
Skehen
v.
Deutsawe.
C'Hair, In re,
Skehen
v.
C'Hair.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Miranda, 285 B.R. 344 (bap10 2001).
285 B.R. 344 (In Re Miranda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re: Roger Evans v. Kathleen McCallister
69 F.4th 1101 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
Untitled Case
N.D. Illinois, 2023
Doll v. Goodman
Tenth Circuit, 2023
McCallister v. Evans
D. Idaho, 2022
In re: Doll
D. Colorado, 2021
In re: DOUGLAS JEROME HARMON; CHRISTINE RENNA HARMON
Ninth Circuit, 2021
Roger A. Evans and Lori A. Steedman
D. Idaho, 2021
Rick Warren v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Tenth Circuit, 2021
Julia F Soussis
E.D. New York, 2020
In re Dickens
513 B.R. 906 (E.D. Arkansas, 2014)
In re Miller
501 B.R. 266 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
In re Acevedo
497 B.R. 112 (D. New Mexico, 2013)
In Re Lewis
346 B.R. 89 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
In Re Swanson
285 B.R. 344 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)