in Re Ming Chu Chang, Ken Mok and Jorge Gonzalez, III

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 31, 2015
Docket13-15-00352-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Ming Chu Chang, Ken Mok and Jorge Gonzalez, III (in Re Ming Chu Chang, Ken Mok and Jorge Gonzalez, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Ming Chu Chang, Ken Mok and Jorge Gonzalez, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00-352-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE MING CHU CHANG, KEN MOK, AND JORGE GONZALEZ III

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria Per Curiam Order

Relators, Ming Chu Chang, Ken Mok, and Jorge Gonzalez III, filed a petition for

writ of mandamus and motion for emergency temporary relief in the above cause on July

30, 2015. Through this original proceeding, relators seek to compel the trial court to

vacate a July 7, 2015 discovery order requiring relators to produce their income tax

returns.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency

temporary relief, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for

emergency temporary relief is hereby GRANTED, and that portion of the trial court’s July 7, 2015 discovery order which requires the production of income tax returns is ordered

STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is

effective until the case is finally decided.”).

The Court requests that the real party in interest, James R. Williams, or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, including but not limited to

American First National Bank or George West 59 Investments, Inc., file a response to the

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this

order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 31st day of July, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Ming Chu Chang, Ken Mok and Jorge Gonzalez, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ming-chu-chang-ken-mok-and-jorge-gonzalez-iii-texapp-2015.