In re Mills
This text of 2002 Ohio 6670 (In re Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 432.]
IN RE MILLS, A MINOR CHILD. [Cite as In re Mills, 2002-Ohio-6670.] Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of In re Cross. (No. 2002-1367—Submitted November 13, 2002—Decided December 13, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 2001-A-0028, 2002-Ohio-3125. __________________ {¶1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of In re Cross, 96 Ohio St.3d 328, 2002- Ohio-4183, 774 N.E.2d 258. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and Felice Harris, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Thomas L. Sartini, Ashtabula County Prosecuting Attorney, and John N. Zomoida Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 Ohio 6670, 97 Ohio St. 3d 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mills-ohio-2002.