In re Militano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Militano

765 A.2d 1064, 166 N.J. 367, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 174

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 9, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 765 A.2d 1064 (In re Militano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Militano, 765 A.2d 1064, 166 N.J. 367, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 174 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that THOMAS F. MILITANO of NEWTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be disciplined for violating RPC 1.2(e) (failing to advise client that the requested assistance is not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS F. MILITANO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI