In re Michael R.
87 A.D.3d 940, 929 N.Y.2d 860
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. Furthermore, its fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant’s challenges to both determinations are identical or substantially similar to arguments this Court rejected on [941]*941a companion appeal (Matter of Daniel E., 82 AD3d 639 [2011]), and there is no reason to reach a different result here. Concur— Tom, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Michael R., 87 A.D.3d 940, 929 N.Y.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
87 A.D.3d 940 (In re Michael R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Anizabel B.
89 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)