In re Michael R.

87 A.D.3d 940, 929 N.Y.2d 860
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 29, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 A.D.3d 940 (In re Michael R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Michael R., 87 A.D.3d 940, 929 N.Y.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. Furthermore, its fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant’s challenges to both determinations are identical or substantially similar to arguments this Court rejected on [941]*941a companion appeal (Matter of Daniel E., 82 AD3d 639 [2011]), and there is no reason to reach a different result here. Concur— Tom, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Anizabel B.
89 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.3d 940, 929 N.Y.2d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-r-nyappdiv-2011.