In re Anizabel B.
89 A.D.3d 589, 933 N.Y.2d 546
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 2011·Published
Opinion
Appellant’s challenges to the court’s suppression ruling are substantially similar to arguments this Court rejected on two companion appeals (Matter of Michael R., 87 AD3d 940 [2011]; Matter of Daniel E., 82 AD3d 639 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011]), and there is no reason to reach a different result here. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Richter and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Anizabel B., 89 A.D.3d 589, 933 N.Y.2d 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 589 (In re Anizabel B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Daniel E.
82 A.D.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Michael R.
87 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)