Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Anizabel B.

In re Anizabel B.

89 A.D.3d 589, 933 N.Y.2d 546
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.3d 589 (In re Anizabel B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Anizabel B., 89 A.D.3d 589, 933 N.Y.2d 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Appellant’s challenges to the court’s suppression ruling are substantially similar to arguments this Court rejected on two companion appeals (Matter of Michael R., 87 AD3d 940 [2011]; Matter of Daniel E., 82 AD3d 639 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011]), and there is no reason to reach a different result here. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Richter and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Daniel E.
82 A.D.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Michael R.
87 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 589, 933 N.Y.2d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anizabel-b-nyappdiv-2011.