In re Michael OO.
This text of 267 A.D.2d 638 (In re Michael OO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Hester, Jr., J.), entered October 14, 1998, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to extend placement of respondent’s son with petitioner for one year.
Petitioner commenced this proceeding in 1996, alleging that [639]*639Dawn 00. and respondent neglected their two children. Respondent admitted various allegations of the petition and was adjudicated to have neglected his children.
The order of extension in this case expired on September 2, 1999, rendering this appeal moot (see, Matter of Anthony G., 247 AD2d 792, 793; Matter of Donald MM., 241 AD2d 634; Matter of Mary R. v Sullivan County Dept. of Social Servs., 217 AD2d 815; Matter of Jamie J., 209 AD2d 896, 898).
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Dawn 00. failed to appear.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D.2d 638, 700 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-oo-nyappdiv-1999.